From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 23 09:02:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EB216A4CE for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:02:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A050443D55 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:02:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 23030 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 23 Dec 2003 17:02:39 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBNH2aM0051477; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:02:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3FE85D53.1060702@Mountain.Net> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:02:37 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Brian Black X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: current@freebsd.org cc: iwasaki@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Award Bios, ACPI, Mouse and PR 55473??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:02:59 -0000 On 23-Dec-2003 Brian Black wrote: > hi, > I have been trying to post to different lists looking for a > solution. though i have found some advice i have not found the > solution. i was recently informed that i should post this question to > the -current list(i should of done this earlier). I have a "Soyo Dragon > Light" mother board which has this award bios. I have verified that my > bios has been flashed with the most up-to date version(Well whatever the > motherboard manufacture says). > Now am certainly not a kernel hacker but i do understand a little > bit of C code. The PR goes on to talk about a "Fix", which involves > editing the "/urs/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c". After making the > changes i had no luck :-(. Now i have been told that some people with > this bios are not affected. Well would'nt that mean the the bios are > not the same? I have contacted "Soyo" on this matter. They state on > their web site that freebsd is supported, but have not returned my > e-mail. > How would i be able to determine weather this problem can be fixed > by FreeBsd or the manufacture of the mother board? Is This problem > being looked at for 5.2R i have not been able to really sink into using > the new 5.x series because of this problem(So what i like GUI's a > little). ;-) Hmm, yes. Can you try the patch at http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/acpi_link_sta.patch Index: acpi_pci_link.c =================================================================== RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -u -r1.11 acpi_pci_link.c --- acpi_pci_link.c 18 Dec 2003 03:25:22 -0000 1.11 +++ acpi_pci_link.c 23 Dec 2003 16:29:35 -0000 @@ -489,7 +489,16 @@ return_ACPI_STATUS (error); } - if (!(sta & (ACPI_STA_PRESENT | ACPI_STA_FUNCTIONAL))) { + /* + * We really should not use link devices that aren't enabled, + * but if they are marked as either functional or enabled, we + * assume they are ok. + * + * XXX: The PCI bridge code requires that both PRESENT and + * ENABLE are set in a separate check. + */ + if ((sta & ACPI_STA_PRESENT) == 0 || + (sta & (ACPI_STA_ENABLE | ACPI_STA_FUNCTIONAL)) == 0) { ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_ERROR, "PCI interrupt link is not functional - %s\n", acpi_name(handle))); -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/