From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 23:34:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1D537B401 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D86A43F75 for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:34:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h496Y1m2016420; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:34:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h496Y0X8016419; Thu, 8 May 2003 23:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 23:34:00 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20030509063400.GB16323@dragon.nuxi.com> Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , "M. Warner Losh" References: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> <20030508.110858.91024289.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030508183612.GA56264@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030508.124451.109704557.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030508.124451.109704557.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: arch@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 06:34:25 -0000 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 12:44:51PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on > : > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree > : > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have > : > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that. > : > > : > NetBSD put them in /rescue. /stand has been phased out over the past > : > few years. There's precident many ways. > : > : How has it been phased out?? My 5.0-RELEASE install certainly has a > : /stand with the contents of: > > /stand never is updated after the initial install, so it slowly rots > away :-( and 'make world' can update it. Or will we have /resuce that is never updated by 'make world'?