Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:28:36 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports MOVED ports/lang Makefile ports/lang/gcc31 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/gcc31/files patch-ad patch-af patch-ai patch-ar patch-fa patch-fb patch-fc patch-va
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508012123390.66285@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
In-Reply-To: <20050801171425.GB1348@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200507311334.j6VDYZcb071651@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050801084048.GA41179@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508011706100.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20050801171425.GB1348@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> I think gcc33 will be there for quite some time, but please note that
>> the gcc33 port fails to work on amd64 and FreeBSD 7.
> I've aware of that.  I still hope, however, that this woudl get fixed in
> some time.  How hard is the problem, BTW?

FreeBSD 7 probably won't be too hard, amd64 is unlikely.

>> Personally, I'd be very hesitant to accept any new port which fails to 
>> work with GCC 3.4 or later.  That's a maintenance nightmare in the making.
> This would of course be highly desirable, but the reality is lots of
> software are nto supported by 3.4.  I tend to blame popular Linnex distros
> that still carry 3.2 and 3.3 versions these days, given that vast
> majority of developers use those as their primary build platforms.  :-(

SUSE builds all of their packages with GCC 4.0 these days, and I've been 
told that Red Hat does the same with Fedora.

Gerald




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.62.0508012123390.66285>