From owner-freebsd-java Wed Dec 30 22:37:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA28756 for freebsd-java-outgoing; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 22:37:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cafe.muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp (cafe.muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp [133.9.68.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA28740; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 22:37:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shudoh@muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp) Received: from muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp (shudoh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cafe.muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp (8.9.1a/3.7W) with ESMTP id PAA27354; Thu, 31 Dec 1998 15:36:48 +0900 Message-Id: <199812310636.PAA27354@cafe.muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp> To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting java stuff? Proposal? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Dec 1998 16:46:32 MST." <199812302346.QAA06707@mt.sri.com> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 15:36:48 +0900 From: SHUDO Kazuyuki Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Internet World recently did an article on Java implementations and speed > > and the FreeBSD tests were rather poor. > > Yep. As a matter of fact, we were almost the slowest, if not *THE* > slowest. That's because we have no JIT, while every other JVM compared > uses one. My understanding is that JDK for FreeBSD make use of C version of interpreter instead of assembly language version as executeJava_p5.*. Is this right? Kazuyuki SHUDO Happy Hacking! Muraoka Lab., Grad. School of Sci. & Eng., Waseda Univ. E-mail: shudoh@muraoka.info.waseda.ac.jp Address: Muraoka Lab., Waseda Univ., 3-4-1 Okubo Shinjuku-ku Tokyo 169-8555 JAPAN TEL: +81-3-3209-5198 FAX: +81-3-3209-5198 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message