From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Sun Jul 19 19:01:17 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8159A6EC1
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 19 Jul 2015 19:01:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com)
Received: from monday.kientzle.com (kientzle.com [142.254.26.11])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2CBE1BD5;
 Sun, 19 Jul 2015 19:01:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com)
Received: (from root@localhost)
 by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id t6JJ1TLj016975;
 Sun, 19 Jul 2015 19:01:29 GMT (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (192.168.1.101 [192.168.1.101])
 by kientzle.com with SMTP id 3b8xdsa33ebajq7rrfnfhcwcaw;
 Sun, 19 Jul 2015 19:01:29 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: ubldr vs ubldr.bin?
From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>
In-Reply-To: <1437019414.1334.355.camel@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:01:09 -0700
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <35BEBE2A-429E-4A56-9A01-5EBB2CF26E60@kientzle.com>
References: <op.x1tfyc2ckndu52@53555a16.cm-6-6b.dynamic.ziggo.nl>
 <1436978285.1334.335.camel@freebsd.org>
 <D31CC1FC-4D0F-456A-BBD6-BD6CEC31B2F1@kientzle.com>
 <1437019414.1334.355.camel@freebsd.org>
To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 19:01:17 -0000


> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:03 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 20:15 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> ubldr.bin is a raw executable image
>>> (no elf headers) which is self-relocating and can be loaded at any
>>> address.  =E2=80=A6  a common armv6[hf] userland that runs
>>> on any board.  Previously the single userland difference between =
various
>>> arm boards is that UBLDR_LOADADDR was different for each board.
>>=20
>> Wonderful!  Nice work.
>>=20
>>=20
>>> =E2=80=A6 and ubldr is still
>>> being built only for compatibility with people that have older =
u-boot
>>> installed.
>>=20
>> Hmmm=E2=80=A6.  I wonder how Crochet should handle this.  Plenty of =
folks use Crochet to build 10-STABLE and 10.1 images, so we have to be a =
little careful about jumping ahead with new features that are only =
available in 11-CURRENT.
>>=20
>> Any plans to MFC this?
>>=20
>> Tim
>=20
> It has all been MFC'd to 10-stable around the end of May and will be =
in
> 10.2.  The only missing piece is changes to the u-boot ports.  I got
> started on that, got like just wandboard done (but not comitted, I'm =
not
> actually a ports committer so I have to get someone's approval to
> commit), then this crazy-deadline project came up at work.

What changes are needed to the U-Boot ports?

Tim