Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:49:40 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Eirik Oeverby <ltning@anduin.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance of jailed processes Message-ID: <xzpfzbqrrff.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4069D708.9040609@anduin.net> (Eirik Oeverby's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:22:32 %2B0200") References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040330133811.93169H-100000@fledge.watson.org> <xzpbrmenocw.fsf@dwp.des.no> <4069D708.9040609@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eirik Oeverby <ltning@anduin.net> writes: > and I thought I was using jails on a 'big' scale... 400 jails on one > single box, that's pretty amazing! What kind of jails are these, > i.e. what are they used for? Encapsulating single processes/tasks > only, or more complex things too? And what hardware are you on, CPU > and memory-wise? Virtual hosting. Dual Athlon MP 3400+, 2 GB dual-channel PC3200 RAM. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpfzbqrrff.fsf>