From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 12:52:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168D516A41F; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:52:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD24543D49; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:52:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from [134.93.180.218] (edda.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC0B30005B2; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:52:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <431D90E1.1030105@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 14:51:45 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-15?Q?f=FCr_Geophysik?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050829) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Cc: Subject: nForce4-SLI, AHCI and NCQ and FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:52:10 -0000 Hello. I have a little question about the popular nForce4-SLI chipset for the Socket 939 platform. The onboard SATA controller of the nForce4-SLI chipset claims to be NCQ (or SATA II) capable, but nVidia implemented this feature in a not-AHCI-standardised way, but as an own solution. My question is: Is the FBSD 6.X driver for the nForce4-SLI chipset capable of using NCQ (as I know, the driver has to enable NCQ and it's not done automatically by the harddrive-controller interaction). Thanks in advance, Oliver