From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 09:31:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF88516A4B3; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2DD43FDF; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 09:31:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9p) with ESMTP id h8JGVS03054746; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:31:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h8JGVUIq078482; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:31:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20030919123123.0370bb98@209.112.4.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:33:37 -0400 To: Scott Long From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20030919094717.0326f068@209.112.4.2> References: <3F6A98F3.7080801@freebsd.org> <6.0.0.22.0.20030919094717.0326f068@209.112.4.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (lava/20020517) cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.9R patch request (was 4.9 stability) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 16:31:32 -0000 Hi, This is the sort of simple patch I mean --- /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/version.c.orig Fri Sep 19 12:27:42 2003 +++ /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/src/version.c Fri Sep 19 12:27:52 2003 @@ -15,4 +15,4 @@ SM_RCSID("@(#)$Id: version.c,v 8.104.2.15 2003/03/19 21:19:53 ca Exp $") -char Version[] = "8.12.9"; +char Version[] = "8.12.9p1"; Otherwise, there is no simple way for most end users to know if they have a safe version of sendmail. ---Mike At 09:51 AM 19/09/2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: >At 01:49 AM 19/09/2003, Scott Long wrote: >>All, >> >>We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9. > >We were seeing the problems prior to Sept 3, but things are stable (small >s) for us now. > >>time to speak up and get the problems resolved so that we can make the >>deadline by next weekend. > >I would really like to see sendmail 8.12.10 imported and MFCd prior to >release. Or at least adjust the version string of the binary so that the >user knows its patched and not vulnerable similar to what was done for 4.8R > > > ---Mike >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"