From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 13 08:00:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DC816A420 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) Received: from munchkin.clue.co.za (munchkin.clue.co.za [66.219.59.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B97013C4D1 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ianf@clue.co.za) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=20070313; d=clue.co.za; h=Received:Received:Received:To:cc:Subject:From:X-Attribution:Date:Message-Id; b=Vb2mIRUMCWMT2sIulRaZPPLkSOQJppRIUj6SL0QITno1dKtIGPz6Zytu21zwou+Q4xKF9PflK/34pLEi5OQ3EivbjQzDYA08c39K+ii1monqunTSVAW25idccogIvgY2DYN0jqmHMk+NFIj1IcaeWqHGXYhw0/HXf5/TJEiYialTcNqVsCTAWQChZZSNVsIKrVY5vKq9xPIXe6m3OxGPMEFx0zbMLRw68WT8VsrcUYWdfazM1+9vQ2V8XIQm0lt5; Received: from uucp by munchkin.clue.co.za with local-rmail (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JPCXJ-00084V-An; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:00:09 +0000 Received: from ianf.clue.co.za ([10.0.0.6] helo=clue.co.za) by urchin.clue.co.za with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JPCWN-0001J8-T9; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:59:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=clue.co.za) by clue.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JPCWL-0000pN-IF; Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:59:09 +0200 To: Ken Smith From: Ian FREISLICH X-Attribution: BOFH Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:59:09 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RC2 Available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:00:12 -0000 Hi I just installed and only now noticed this oddity (to me at least). Maybe it's been explained before, but I can't quite remember. I selected auto defaults for the slice editor. The system I installed (amd64) on has 16GB of RAM yet it only assigned 4GB for swap. I remember reading that on amd64 minidumps could corrupt neighbouring filesystems, so a full dump could be up to 16GB. There won't be enough space for a full dump. That said, 16GB is quite a *lot* to swap out and I'm not sure how the system would perform under that scenario. What's the prevailing wisdom? Is this a variable storage type bug in the installer - int in stead of an off_t or size_t? Ian -- Ian Freislich