From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 27 10:17:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A138E106566C for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:17:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F608FC08 for ; Wed, 27 May 2009 10:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender; b=n4aVp1YfhaQAOD89HkSozYwEpeaWqg7ULqkTvFUV0AJoJMFhHbl6jbPJonkeea5lEZp4h3wBAj8q8GerD/aquolQSEGNdUc1zxkoHd24bgRmlNGQU7+R1vZT96qNF6poa+h0s5GYPQLhPPxieSf+8U9jqUWw8ylfZVRTjp4no5I=; Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25]) by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1M9GCA-000NZv-Sd; Wed, 27 May 2009 14:17:15 +0400 Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:17:12 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <1Rc2f/mn4q/bRzg8uAsl4ZMkCeY@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4> References: <200905261234.42869.jkim@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200905261234.42869.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru Cc: Rui Paulo , freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru: Patch for "device_attach: estX attach returned 6" on half of the cores] X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:17:17 -0000 Jung-uk, good day. Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:34:33PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Tuesday 26 May 2009 05:54 am, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > > It's mine ;)) Though I hadn't looked at the newer ACPI-CA yet. > > --- >8 --- SNIP!!! --- >8 --- > > As I posted earlier, it should be fixed in the newer ACPI-CA: > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905041551.19904.jkim > > Sorry, if you missed it. Yes, missed it, thanks for the link! Having looked at the patch itself I have an impression that it will not solve the original problem: while ACPI-CA now correctly dereferences aliases found in the path (currently I am interested only Processor objects), but still, full walk will return both real nodes and their aliases. So for my case of dual-way machine with aliases to both processors, all four objects seem to be inserted to the ACPI namespace, so again, acpi_cpu will be attached twice to the first processor. But I want to be mistaken and will try your patch that imports the latest ACPI-CA for the -CURRENT. Will report on my findings. Thanks! -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ #