Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 13:38:52 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux-base 6.2 vs linux-base 7 Message-ID: <20011123133852.B4488@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111231942230.876-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>; from dinesh@alphaque.com on Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:44:28PM %2B0800 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111231942230.876-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 07:44:28PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: > > hey, > > have linux-base 6.2 installed and working fine for a bunch of linux > binaries including staroffice 5.2 and netscape-linux, both from the ports > collection. planning on trying out staroffice 6.0-beta, but it depends on > linux_base-7. > > my question is if i used portsupgrade to replace linux base 6.2 with 7, > will anything else break ? would love to hear user experiences on this > one. linux_base-7 needs an updated linuxulator..you need to cvsup your source tree to RELENG_4 and rebuild your world and kernel. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7/sHrWry0BWjoQKURAh0UAKC/qGmMgNv6ypeleyeqgwrhOdnXawCeM2O7 O+UUcH/zuGerTOJUjqFFhPE= =GDYe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011123133852.B4488>