From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 27 22:05:07 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0AD1065696;
	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F248FC20;
	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id BAA25379;
	Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:05:04 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua)
Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1Op72m-0003Wd-Mc; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:05:04 +0300
Message-ID: <4C783690.2020101@icyb.net.ua>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:05:04 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100822 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de>
	<201008271615.58056.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<4C781DDB.1080903@icyb.net.ua>
	<201008271803.27295.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201008271803.27295.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 8.1-PRERELEASE: CPU packages not detected correctly
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 22:05:07 -0000

on 28/08/2010 01:03 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> On Friday 27 August 2010 04:19 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I still don't get your point.
>> My point is that if the Intel's code gets the topology right, then
>> the hardware is emulated properly and the problem is with the
>> patch.
>> What is your point? :)
> 
> My point is "right" topology means nothing in this context if CPU 
> affinity of guest OS does not reflect hypervisor's point of view.

I see.  And I just cared about the pretty message in dmesg, nothing more :-)


-- 
Andriy Gapon