From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 02:22:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6D316A4CE for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 02:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isq002.isq.pt (isq002.isq.pt [192.92.150.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DA843D39 for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 02:22:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from NCPires@isq.pt) Received: by isq002 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 25 May 2004 10:22:14 +0100 Message-ID: <6A7539CE32D1CC42AD0B863337EEFCFB020B20F9@isq004> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nuno_C=E9sar_Pires?= To: 'Matthew Seaman' , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nuno_C=E9sar_Pires?= Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:20:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: Help to start BIND on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 09:22:30 -0000 The problem is that this behaviour occurs also in a fresh installation (4.9/8.3.6) in a different box (following the same installation = checklist). At this moment I'm considering to install and setup BIND 8.3.7 in the = same box that is running BIND 8.3.6 manually, i.e. not on boot. :-(( Thanks Matthew, I will give you the feedback of this. Nuno -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Seaman [mailto:m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk]=20 Sent: segunda-feira, 24 de Maio de 2004 14:09 To: Nuno C=E9sar Pires Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: Re: Help to start BIND on boot On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Nuno C=E9sar Pires wrote: > My question is: what solve the problem, the new FreeBSD 5.2.1 or the = BIND > 8.3.7? Good question. It's unlikely to be the simple replacement of one OS version or one BIND version for another -- we would know about it if there was a general problem with people running BIND on FreeBSD. =20 > How can I solve this strange behaviour in the FreeBSD 4.9/BIND 8.3.6 system? Unfortunately, having made my best guess, I'm afraid I'm all out of suggestions. Other than this: take a close look at the way both of those boxes are set up, and try and isolate the differences in configuration between the two. The answer should lie somewhere in there -- something you did differently on one of the boxes. Isolate that, and you're home and dry. Which is easy to say, but not necessarily easy to do. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH = UK =20 CONFIDENCIALIDADE: Esta mensagem e quaisquer documentos em anexo s=E3o confidenciais. Se n=E3o for o destinat=E1rio desta mensagem, = agradecemos que avise imediatamente o remetente e que a elimine sem a reproduzir, = armazenar ou divulgar a qualquer entidade. CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential = and may be privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the = sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it = for any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium.