From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 12:45:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A91B16A41F for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:45:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B1843D46 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:45:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so195292wri for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:45:47 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rFxxJe97v7R76+NWKHys1KYSRJR76EXFr0eXnjjRzkQwb44Pk4NUgP2j5gFP5z473H76GaJd+qbHfMoA33zDETi/2YVnRJLywGCGnZhjwrtrDZ+OzDwG5eXhgrKkOMxsrdbjo2P28LYhB898xpYykK6/kuduhJKIyNs+Ysmmdyk= Received: by 10.54.13.67 with SMTP id 67mr501381wrm; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.38.32 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 05:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70e8236f050721054520940895@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:45:15 +0100 From: Joao Barros To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Quality of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joao Barros List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:45:48 -0000 Hi all, Robert, I was hopping for you to mention user's feedback. I started this thread http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-July/052288.html back with SNAP004. The problem is still present in BETA1. I haven't seen any more advances in the thread, and I know this must be a very localized issue, and that everyone is pretty busy with the upcoming release but I wouldn't want this issue forgotten. Should I submit a PR? As this is a kernel issue, I'm pretty much stuck to 5, although I would prefer start using 6. Yet, another loyal FreeBSD user :-) -- Joao Barros