Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Apr 2000 23:08:37 -0600
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        David Holloway <davidhol@windriver.com>
Cc:        Ugen Antsilevitch <ugen@xonix.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ?
Message-ID:  <38EEBED5.F2D245D@softweyr.com>
References:  <200004072315.QAA01455@papermill.wrs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Holloway wrote:
> 
> In message <38EE6AA7.55DEA97D@xonix.com>, Ugen Antsilevitch writes:
> >
> >Gustavo V G C Rios wrote:
> >
> >QNX is great and all the power to it. This is FreeBSD and it is unix and BSD
> >and as such it is what it is. If it would take a QNX approach then it would 
> >not be FreeBSD but something rather different. Thats the answer...
> 
> Yeah I wouldn't want to have to retaliate with
> shameless plugs of vxWorks.

Because that might cause me to go off on a rant about how inappropriate
both are for making well-behaved internet servers.  Portability my ass.

-- 
            "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38EEBED5.F2D245D>