From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 28 8:18:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from skraldespand.demos.su (skraldespand.demos.su [194.87.5.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196B51537C for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 08:18:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mishania@skraldespand.demos.su) Received: (from mishania@localhost) by skraldespand.demos.su (8.9.3/8.9.2) id UAA14834; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 20:13:40 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from mishania) Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 20:13:39 +0400 From: "Mikhail A. Sokolov" To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: Darren Reed , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another ufs panic.. Message-ID: <19990328201339.A14768@demos.su> References: <199903281420.AAA18161@cheops.anu.edu.au> <36FE4857.14E19467@newsguy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <36FE4857.14E19467@newsguy.com>; from "Daniel C. Sobral" on Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 12:18:47AM +0900 X-Useless-Header: Look ma! It's a # sign! X-Point-of-View: Gravity is myth, - the earth sucks. Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 12:18:47AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: # > ...there have been substantial ufs improvements in 3.x, yes ? # No. Nobody has been complaining about ufs. Hell, that's the fs we # all use. We wouldn't be *able* to do anything if it was so buggy. You didn't look into at least 2 month old archives, did you? Pardon to comment in such a useless way, but it sometimes hurt people wouldn't read before answering. Darren, people who moved from 2.x to 3.x-stable are reporting nicely about their systems, might be you should as well. Again, why did you use pax but cpio and such? # Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) # dcs@freebsd.org -- -mishania P.S. isn't this a -stable matter? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message