From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 29 13:11:24 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BBB16A401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:11:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sascha@rincewind.c4inet.net)
Received: from rincewind.c4inet.net (rincewind.c4inet.net [84.203.161.114])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D798143D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:11:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sascha@rincewind.c4inet.net)
Received: (qmail 28575 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Apr 2006 14:13:10 +0100
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:13:10 +0100
From: Sascha Luck <lists@c4inet.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20060429131310.GA21668@saoirse.c4inet.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Subject: Re: CFT: new ath hal
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:11:26 -0000

Sam Leffler wrote:
>  Otherwise I believe I fixed the sparc builds.

I've built it as a module on 6.1PR/sparc64 (as of 09.03.2006) and it
still
shows the same behaviour as the previous build (PR sparc64/94483)

cheers,
s.