From owner-freebsd-isdn Mon Apr 6 13:54:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA11684 for freebsd-isdn-outgoing; Mon, 6 Apr 1998 13:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peedub.muc.de (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA11637 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 1998 13:54:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA00904 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 1998 00:54:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <199804062254.AAA00904@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Callback with i4b Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Apr 1998 19:45:54 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1998 00:54:36 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hellmuth Michaelis writes: >AFAIK yet, the problems are based on several things: > > - isdnd is currently no able to handle simultaneous callins and > callouts (the callout for a callback destination goes out on > one B channel and before this call is terminated the callback > comes in on the other B channel). Changing isdnd to be able to > handle this situation is non-trivial. > this may also require some changes in the kernel. I'm willing to look into getting this working (I looked at a few months ago and still have a vague idea what's needed), unless someone else *really* wants to do it. I'm also thinking about doing this (from the TODO) - "- fix operation of close_allactive() in isdnd" since its current sorry state is basically my fault. Heck, Easter's coming - 4 day weekend :-) --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message