From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 30 17:27:19 2008 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819211065674; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:27:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B5B8FC14; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>) id <1KZUEH-0003ns-Tk>; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:27:17 +0200 Received: from e178051073.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.51.73] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>) id <1KZUEH-0004aN-Os>; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:27:17 +0200 Message-ID: <48B98324.80008@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:28:04 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> References: <DA7CCD48-3A8E-4360-B739-3F68482F99A4@airwired.net> <48B8395A.7020607@ibctech.ca> <48B85FBE.9040303@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <48B86928.1090904@FreeBSD.org> <48B91213.5000202@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <48B91926.1070802@FreeBSD.org> <48B92FEC.7060301@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <48B93505.7010000@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <48B95D39.1070402@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48B95D39.1070402@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.51.73 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNING: 7-STABLE BROKEN -- please wait to upgrade / Should be OK now X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:27:19 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: >> O. Hartmann wrote: >>> Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>> O. Hartmann wrote: >>>>> Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>>>> O. Hartmann wrote: >>>>>>> Steve Bertrand wrote: >>>>>>>> Dan Allen wrote: >>>>>>>>> Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing >>>>>>>>> builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morning: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FreeBSD ids.eagle.ca 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: >>>>>>>> Fri Aug 29 11:38:12 EDT 2008 >>>>>>>> steve@ids:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The dmesg if it is relevant: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://ww3.ibctech.ca/ids.dmesg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>> Well, mine did not. I was capable of compiling world and kernel >>>>>>> and also capable of installing all things like I did in the >>>>>>> past, but ZFS seems still broken - the module does not load >>>>>>> automatically at initialization time nor is it loadable via >>>>>>> kldload (there is an error about missing opensolaris module but >>>>>>> I can't find anything about this module ...). >>>>>> >>>>>> It's new, you need to build it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kris >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>> Well, I hoped the 'buildworld' build everything process would do >>>>> so? Do I need an extra option in my kernel config? >>>> >>>> It is a kernel module, it doesn't get built by buildworld (by >>>> default). If you use the default build settings for your kernel, >>>> it builds all modules including this one. If you use >>>> MODULES_OVERRIDE or similar to specify a list of modules to build, >>>> you have to add it to the list. >>>> >>>> Kris >>> The module is indeed present, and it was all the time present. >>> Obviously is something wrong or not in the right order with my >>> config. When makeing buildworld and then rebooting the box, ZFS >>> module does not automatically load OpenSOLARIS module when it >>> detects its absence. I guess I need to fix an 'option opensolaris' >>> in my kernel config. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Oliver >> >> >> here I am again. On a less critical mashine the installation process >> (buildwork/installworld and the same to the kernel) went through >> without problems. This box does have a ZFS device for backup purposes >> only, not essential. >> >> The box starts/booot. >> When I try loading either opensolaris.ko/zfs.ko, I get this: >> >> link_elf_obj: symbol stack_save undefined >> kldload: /boot/kernel/opensolaris.ko: Unsupported file type >> link_elf_obj: symbol stack_save undefined >> kldload: /boot/kernel/opensolaris.ko: Unsupported file type >> KLD zfs.ko: depends on opensolaris - not available >> kldload: /boot/kernel/zfs.ko: Unsupported file type >> >> I guess I forgot some of the recommended compiler switches ... ?? > > The link_elf_obj error is important. It looks like they rely on > either DDB or STACK in your kernel. > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" As recommended formerly in this list I defined 'options KDTRACE_HOOKS' in my kernel config due to the DTRACE merge. But I do not have any debugging option defined yet in any of my machine's kernels because of performance reasons. So, if I understand your comment the right way, I need to enable either STACK or DDB or both? I will try this anyway, starting with STACK, but I do not understand why I'm forced to do so. Thanks, Oliver