From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 03:13:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1F516A4CE; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:13:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw [140.112.90.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DCF43D54; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3E3DRJQ082148; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:13:27 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: (from rafan@localhost) by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3E3DKvx082147; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:13:20 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from rafan) Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:13:20 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan To: Marcus Grando Message-ID: <20050414031320.GA82105@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> References: <200503210441.j2L4fQRB021246@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <20050322084911.GA21666@heechee.tobez.org> <20050322090810.GY34807@k7.mavetju> <42401591.9090306@corp.grupos.com.br> <20050322133325.GA1849@heechee.tobez.org> <20050412213158.GA41666@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <425DDC09.7070802@corp.grupos.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <425DDC09.7070802@corp.grupos.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i cc: Edwin Groothuis cc: Cheng-Lung Sung cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Anton Berezin cc: sem@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/policyd name conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:13:38 -0000 On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:57:13PM -0300, Marcus Grando wrote: > Hi, > > > mail/postfix-policyd-sqlgrey > > mail/postfix-policyd-postgrey > > mail/postfix-policyd-spf > mail/postfix-policyd-greylist > > For me is the best way. to me, the part after policyd should be the name of original software name? > > A bit long name? If in this case, I would suggest that we don't > > touch them and just rename mail/policyd to mail/policyd-spf > > and the new one will be mail/policyd (just google policyd, it is > > in the second result). > > I don't think so. Long name is not problem. Hmm, I think again and again. agree with you. > > This week i send PR to rename mail/policyd to mail/postfix-policyd-spf Thanks, then I'll send a new policyd shar. Regards, rafan.