From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Wed Sep 30 17:58:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5012A0C754 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91D701F71 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so209584656wic.1 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:58:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=xqQSO+SWzDfnEl1CJJGvfxk1MW3hYFJwMmsiboM3biM=; b=QxYmqRadLVhTwQLkiKmQdmHXb0kKvTCS68L5qGMac0jhd9X3piU4J1MPTdkspBX3WZ kHH8gzPr7bMUMFkUMYsuGaBpGsSjIB7g+m8xHyKmhKgmi/3flmckLE3nyY8YSzCgsccb OQCQ4zsLnVRTi98emwD/mwV8GIdm+kdFghHmjDOngNykbLneqgdDEe0Lnn/R7LRLrMGV LdIAk4ZkAWrbBrV/AHsdJe5VaNGUOCGOyp4l1fqoKS6dj35yQShgNJ7dw1OuuUffCGZI gRzB3xyxwmgL/hbCuo7vWis0URAwXJu2JVHnB86hJiMmVwxnUNnP/XUaj7PnmvYtG1pM kZ4w== X-Received: by 10.180.81.228 with SMTP id d4mr34002740wiy.38.1443635927020; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:58:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.115.3 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 10:58:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <560C1EF0.9090509@FreeBSD.org> References: <560C1AEF.9040202@FreeBSD.org> <560C1EF0.9090509@FreeBSD.org> From: "C. L. Martinez" Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:58:07 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: Re: AMD processors supported under bhyve To: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:58:50 -0000 On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 09/30/2015 13:32, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jung-uk Kim >> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> On 09/30/2015 12:54, C. L. Martinez wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:03 AM, C. L. Martinez >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jason Tubnor >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 29 September 2015 at 20:07, C. L. Martinez >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe a stupid question, but are AMD processors >>>>>>> supported under FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE for bhyve or are they >>>>>>> only supported under 11-CURRENT? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 10.2-RELEASE is the first release to contain AMD support >>>>>> (10.1-STABLE did have support however). 11-CURRENT >>>>>> obviously supports it and is where you'll find all the >>>>>> latest patches/fixes when reports are made. I use TrueOS >>>>>> monthly 11-CURRENT snapshots specifically for this reason >>>>>> (and to have binary updates). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Jason... My idea is to use or FreeBSD or HardenedBSD >>>>> for this host, and if I have problems maybe I will try TrueOS >>>>> ... >>>> >>>> Uhmm I am installing 10.2-STABLE and I am seeing the following >>>> error: >>>> >>>> module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (vmm, 0xffffffff81d914b0, 0) >>>> error 6 >>>> >>>> Does this means AMD is not supported yet or what?? >>> >>> We don't support some early generation CPUs. >>> >>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve >>> >>> "Barcelona" class and newer AMD processors include the required >>> RVI extension and as with Intel processors, presence of the >>> "POPCNT" (POPulation Count) processor feature in dmesg(8) >>> indicates RVI support. Note some processors such as Kuma core >>> have POPCNT feature but lacks required "NRIPS" (Next RIP Save) >>> feature. >>> >>> Jung-uk Kim >> >> >> Oops .. Thanks Jung-uk. But, is not currently supported for 10.X or >> it will never supported? I am asking about using 11-CURRENT. > > I believe it won't be supported any time soon unless someone is > silently working on it. :-( > > Jung-uk Kim Ok, many thanks to all for your help