Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:05:29 -0500 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> To: "David W . Chapman Jr ." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: "David W . Chapman Jr ." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IPFilter licence update Message-ID: <000801c0eeed$f18be170$0101a8c0@cascade> References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106061730440.94127-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com> <003f01c0eeeb$4d03bdf0$0101a8c0@cascade> <20010606195618.C47727@leviathan.inethouston.net> <003201c0eeed$47b57cb0$0101a8c0@cascade> <20010606200343.E47727@leviathan.inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I don't want them to go away -- did you read my message? Tom Veldhouse veldy@veldy.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "David W . Chapman Jr ." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> Cc: "David W . Chapman Jr ." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>; <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:03 PM Subject: Re: IPFilter licence update > On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:00:44PM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > You don't need GCC to run the system, only build it. Thus you can install a > > system that is ONLY BSD licensed code -- or at least, very close. I > > personally wouldn't mind if the whole system was GPL, versus BSD (I prefer > > the latter). However, the currently licensing is BSD and as such, the base > > system (contrib aside) can run with the GPL tools used to build it. > > > I think its safe to say that gcc isn't going away anytime soon and > half the gnu tools that go along with it, no matter how much more you > prefer BSD license. > > -- > David W. Chapman Jr. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000801c0eeed$f18be170$0101a8c0>