From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 11:49:30 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B19106566B; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A718FC17; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1R8Vpr-0001uC-BG>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:28:27 +0200 Received: from telesto.geoinf.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.86.198]) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1R8Vpr-0007JF-9M>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:28:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4E81B358.5070706@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:28:24 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Freie =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t_Berlin?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> <20110927012902.2ebb4a3e@lab.lovett.com> <4e81e1c6.gA+ZK1BK2KFWANDY%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4e81e1c6.gA+ZK1BK2KFWANDY%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 130.133.86.198 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, ade@freebsd.org Subject: Re: outside the box (Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:49:30 -0000 On 09/27/11 16:46, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Ade Lovett wrote: > >> The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have >> chosen to do things a certain way. Unfortunately for us (us >> being FreeBSD), we have now broken these conceptions by moving >> to a dual-digit major release. > > I don't suppose > > REVISION="A.1" > > i.e. using a single hex digit instead of two decimal digits, > would work any better :) > ... it will only postpone the agony ... better to deal now than shifting it to the future ...