Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 23:21:32 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 262873] The FreeBSD GNOME Project: page and sidebar update Message-ID: <bug-262873-9-Guej9vSpel@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-262873-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-262873-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D262873 Neel Chauhan <nc@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nc@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Neel Chauhan <nc@FreeBSD.org> --- I don't work on the web-facing stuff, but just by browsing the FreeBSD GNOME website is wayyy out-of-date. I don't normally check that site, since I cam remember the information on the top of my head for some reason. https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting/ is stuck in the GNOME 2 days. https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/screenshots/ shows a GNOME 3.16 screenshot, b= ut GNOME 40+ looks slightly different than GNOME 3.16 (e.g. flatter). Although looking at this makes me miss non-HiDPI displays while pixelated they ran X= 11 apps perfectly. https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/contact/ is outdated. And there are dead links: * https://www.freebsd.org/ports/gnome/ * https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq232/ * https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2/ Honestly, I'd just nuke the https://www.freebsd.org/gnome site and just rel= y on the wiki. That's more likely to get updated than a poorly-maintained website section. I know many people may still want it there, and that's fine with me if peop= le prefer. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-262873-9-Guej9vSpel>