From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 27 00:36:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4372B4F3 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C3501E2C for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id uy5so1625349obc.5 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:36:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YsK9DKJyEoY5ZQdpIEE+qbC0pQ2AkLdBGbC4pmfqaw0=; b=RFjRdlT1/J5SPtca45MqGyw4JbztXXXKjxH+a7dis2L2mr7hXqfafOBskDItoF7jSm sSPChyjDji6mQaJGi+uTjYSH7Gu3KO5MCM5D63ahfq503CxrfUPh7O+eeO7wKvK5i83x sFwiaNMu2QwGxpvEmOYvdTQpWlzYoVASp0cRlo/JhxKLhfdrWsa0An020yIE2N7QI2LC UC3jfGx0cj0TByCMGAAbcyEUQPg7S9BW/SaftgUzTSWia3judoRV7EdraGyrTToRuuOp dN7g1C7Xk7xkbXAqYAwy7AjT3O4NVhtX31FE0U6jJ9oAJD00SDmuiAslcabx74gM4etY AC2g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.62.199 with SMTP id a7mr3680419oes.64.1393461389360; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:36:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.78.71 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:36:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:36:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: UDP Lite support From: Joe Nosay To: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:36:30 -0000 The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been reconsidered or is the likelihood of too many damaged packets the reason for not supporting? I'm not sure where to put this question. Apologies for the noise.