From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 9 21:38:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from evil.2y.net (port-7-179.adsl.one.net [216.23.15.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B37151FF for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 21:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cokane@evil.2y.net) Received: (from cokane@localhost) by evil.2y.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA01203; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 00:40:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cokane) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 00:40:54 -0500 From: Coleman Kane To: Evgeny Roubinchtein , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When does the 4.x branch go stable? Message-ID: <20000110004054.A1181@evil.2y.net> References: <20000109214046.7913BA54DB@netcom1.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from eroubinc@u.washington.edu on Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 06:50:22PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Obviously, you have never tried to make world with the new egcs, it is almost impossible since there are many violations of ANSI C and C++ in the code right now. The kernel does, however, properly compile (minus some ext2fs crap). --cokane Evgeny Roubinchtein had the audacity to say: > On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Mike Harding wrote: > > > > >I'm interested in picking up the new gcc, but I was just curious as to > >when the 4.x branch becomes -STABLE, since the release is just around > >the corner. Also, that would be 4.x -STABLE, right? > > This is perhaps tangential, but if you wish to use gcc-2.95.2 for your > projects, why not install the "egcs" port (it's actually gcc-2.95.2)? > > > -- > Evgeny > > The computing field is always in need of new cliches. - Alan Perlis > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message