From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 11:53:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752DD1065672 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA528FC36 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBFBrdKu053393; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:53:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBFBrd6r053390; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:53:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:53:39 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chad Perrin In-Reply-To: <20081215061706.GG5527@kokopelli.hydra> Message-ID: <20081215125319.N53356@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <31371229120906@webmail12.yandex.ru> <87iqppdlzh.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081213002037.F5665@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213092104.GC39031@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213103054.B8893@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213194302.GA51063@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213122621.001352ad@gom.home> <20081213213446.K44622@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213133151.5d833c1c@gom.home> <20081213224710.Q44804@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081215061706.GG5527@kokopelli.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:53:53 -0000 >> >> and exactly is needed on that group. it would be enough that moderator's >> job will be just removing posts that classify to NTG. NOTHING else. > > As long as neither you, nor anyone that thinks like you, is in charge of > moderation, it might not be a *complete* disaster. > of course it should be you to remove all my posts:)