From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Aug 24  6: 3:43 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from vax1.baker.ie (VAX1.baker.IE [194.125.50.91])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A367B1514A
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 06:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cillian@baker.ie)
Received: from baker.ie ([194.125.50.55]) by vax1.baker.ie with ESMTP;
          Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:05:43 +0100
Message-ID: <37C29421.E916F57@baker.ie>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 13:46:25 +0100
From: Cillian Sharkey <cillian@baker.ie>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Hartung <hartung@zkom.de>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kernel size
References: <37C29488.70317DF2@zkom.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> The two kernelīs are based on exactly the same
> kernel configuration file. The smaller one was
> compiled on a 3.1 system, the bigger one on a
> 3.2 system.
> 
> What is the reason for 6363006 Bytes difference?

Probably because there's a little more code in 3.2 than in 3.1 :)

Cillian


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message