From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 16 11:40:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74EA16A468 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2DB13C442 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ihkm9-0004qB-KI for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:39:53 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:39:53 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:39:53 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:40:31 +0200 Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20071016110642.GB54457@hyperion.scode.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) In-Reply-To: <20071016110642.GB54457@hyperion.scode.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: Status of MySQL on 7 w/o patches applied X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:40:15 -0000 Peter Schuller wrote: > The report on these indicates some uncommitted patches were used, one > of which was supposedly very important for performance (file > descriptor locking IIRC). All important patches, including the one you mentioned, were committed. > My question is - what is the expected status of MySQL performance in > FreeBSD 7 (without external patches) at this time? Should be great... > I ask because I recently (a couple of weeks ago) did comparisons using > sysbench (comparable to what was used in the benchmark used previously > in the report) between 6.2 and 7-CURRENT. Selects were actually half > as fast or less than 6.2 in this particular case (identical hardware). Just in case you missed some debugging knobs: can you retest with RELENG_7? (not -current).