From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jan 9 5:56: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0908015B42 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 05:55:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA22928; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 14:55:30 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA52800; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 14:55:30 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 14:55:30 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: Ben Rosengart Cc: FreeBSD , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: load spike strangeness Message-ID: <20000109145529.C51101@bitbox.follo.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from ben@skunk.org on Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 02:41:51AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 02:41:51AM -0500, Ben Rosengart wrote: > [-stable and -current trimmed] > > Please, people, can't we just respect each other's choice to reveal our > names or not, and get on with our lives? This debate seems foolish to > me -- I didn't see Mr. Anonymous demanding commit privileges, so the > argument that his real name would get him taken more seriously is kind > of bogus. > > (BTW, Mr. A., I think your sig is flame bait, and contrary to the spirit That's Mr. Jxxx N. Lxxxxx, actually, but I didn't know that until he started babbling about anonymity, annoying me enough that I checked. I also have strong suspicions why he's hiding - touting that you don't have the guts to stand for what you are doing (thus using precieved anonymity as a shield) is none too wise if you want to keep that anonymity. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message