Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Sep 1996 17:03:51 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Guido van Rooij <Guido.vanRooij@nl.cis.philips.com>
To:        nao@sbl.cl.nec.co.jp (Naoki Hamada)
Cc:        guido@gvr.win.tue.nl, dfr@render.com, Guido.vanRooij@nl.cis.philips.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: new if_vx driver on freefall
Message-ID:  <199609201503.RAA25073@spooky.lss.cp.philips.com>
In-Reply-To: <199609200757.QAA20436@sirius.sbl.cl.nec.co.jp> from Naoki Hamada at "Sep 20, 96 04:57:33 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Naoki Hamada wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> A few of my friends tested the new vx driver. The result is mostly
> positive with/without BROKEN_AVAIL after a ping -f -s 1000. But one of
> them reported that his system works with the new vx driver (with
> BROKEN_AVAIL) almost well, but the network stops sometimes, then he
> had to re-ifconfig the board.

I ordered the specs from 3com and I'm waiting for them. Basically,if your board
runs fine without BROKEN_AVAIL, do *not* define it.
If it stops for your firends, could you verfiy with ifconfig vx0 that
the state is OACTIVE?

-Guido



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609201503.RAA25073>