From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 10 16:05:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA06639 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:05:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from acroal.com (firewall0.acroal.com [209.24.61.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA06629 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:05:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamil@acroal.com) Received: from localhost (jamil@localhost) by acroal.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA25918; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:05:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamil@acroal.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:05:40 -0800 (PST) From: "J. Weatherbee - Senior Systems Architect" To: Terry Lambert cc: jasone@canonware.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OS Ports In-Reply-To: <199712102332.QAA27170@usr02.primenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > There aren't any good, freely available 68030/68040 processor emulators, > nor any good, freely available Alpha emulators, from what I've been able > to determine. If you are just into writing an emulator, you may want > to tackle one of those. Of the two, the 68040 would be *much* easier to > do (IMO). I've actually been getting pretty serious about maybye doing a M68300 emulator, I.E. 68330, 68331, 68332, 68F33, 68334, 68336, 68340, 68341, 68349, or 68360 emulator. Simply because I have some very good familiarity with the 68hc11 series. And the 68300's are actually still being made all of the above for embedded systems (running up to 25Mhz). This makes it a little more testable. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. >