From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Aug 8 06:22:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF865BB165A for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from mproxy21.sbb.rs (mproxy21.sbb.rs [89.216.2.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.sbb.rs", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD841525 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 06:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from knossos (cable-178-148-110-164.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.110.164]) by mproxy21.sbb.rs (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u78651Iu002969; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 08:05:01 +0200 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at SBB mail Received: from localhost (knossos [local]) by knossos (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 60e386ed; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 08:05:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 08:05:01 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: Doug Hardie Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update from 9.3 to 11.0 Message-ID: <20160808060501.GA90827@knossos> References: <20160808042708.GA15144@knossos> <26DC9293-6228-463F-A924-82F807C3FF42@mail.sermon-archive.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26DC9293-6228-463F-A924-82F807C3FF42@mail.sermon-archive.info> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mproxy21.sbb.rs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 06:22:12 -0000 > The patch (correctly applied by hand) worked fine. The update completed and the server is running 11.0-BETA4. I have sources on both boxen. When time comes, I will add a patch. Is it the same way to get a patch like " patch < something"? You saved me from installing from the start, which I dislike a lot. Not right now. I will wait for a release. If I do it more freq, my nodes would stop working, since they are not new (read old). Zoran