From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 21 02:19:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F33F16A400 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0D643D45 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3L2Jic5019186; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:19:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:19:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <44481D12.1000207@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <44481D12.1000207@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604202219.43742.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1411/Thu Apr 20 18:23:28 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: SMP on 4.11++ with > 4 cpus X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:19:51 -0000 On Thursday 20 April 2006 07:45 pm, Julian Elischer wrote: > Does this work? > > We have a Dual CPU dualcore with HTT that enumerates to 8 cpus. > It hangs badly under heavy networking load under 4.x. Hang as in deadlock or hang as in livelock? (Does ping still work for example)=20 > Does anyone have an 8-way 4.x machine that works? > > We do have a small patch installed that helps it enumerate the CPUS. > (so that we see all the cpus). What did you have to patch? It's supposed to enumerate all the HTT cpus out of the box. (And multicore should look like HTT, but possibly with 4 HTTs). =2D-=20 John Baldwin =A0<>< =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =A0=3D =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org