From owner-freebsd-security Wed Oct 4 12:35:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D5237B502; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:35:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA82717; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:35:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:35:23 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: scanner@jurai.net Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OSSH and NetBSD's "OSSH" ? Message-ID: <20001004123523.G73561@freefall.freebsd.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from scanner@jurai.net on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:44:27PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:44:27PM -0400, scanner@jurai.net wrote: > > Since were trying to keep in sync with OpenSSH as the goal, has anyone > given thought if we will maintain compatability with NetBSD's > "OpenSSH" replacement? > > I think their decision to do their own implementation is just daft. But I > am curious as to how this will affect things. I am guessing we will just > sync with OSSH and if NetBSD's version happens to be compat fine if not > too bad so sad. This whole thing really annoys me. But I am curious about > others thoughts. I didn't know they have decided to fork their own version - all I've seen in their cvs logs is integration of the openbsd version. At any rate, I will be continuing to track the openbsd version, and compatability is something which the open and netbsd guys will have to work out for themselves. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message