From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 26 15:04:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00161065678 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE5A13C447 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from Home.local (32.Red-80-37-158.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.37.158.32]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCA61C0847; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:04:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47C42A7C.3070008@locolomo.org> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:04:28 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local> <200802261541.03781.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47C42561.5000005@locolomo.org> <200802261549.39342.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200802261549.39342.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E4chler_Philippe?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP Messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:04:30 -0000 Mel wrote: > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 15:42:41 Erik Norgaard wrote: >> Mel wrote: >>> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 13:14:11 Mächler Philippe wrote: >>>> %netstat -rn >>>> Routing tables >>>> >>>> Internet: >>>> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use >>>> Netif Expire >>>> >>>> 192.168.2 192.168.3.254 UGS 0 8209 >>>> bge1 >>>> 192.168.3 link#2 UC 0 0 >>>> bge1 >>> These routes look fishy. It shouldn't have a route for 192.168.2 cause >>> it's nowhere defined, so it should go through default, not through bge1. >>> Any chance a machine on your network has 192.168.2/24 and publishing it, >>> where it should be 80.242 something? >>> Try route delete 192.168.2.0 and see if it clears. >> This part is ok if you see the schema in OPs later mail. > > Really? Where do you see 192.168.TWO instead of 192.168.THREE? OK, this is the schema OP posted in a different mail, lines wrapped badly, I've repaired: ------------- --------------- ¦ server ¦ switch ¦router/firewall¦ switch ¦192.168.3.222¦---[(3.x/24)]---¦ 192.168.3.254 ¦---[(2.x/24)] ¦80.242.192.80¦bge1 --------------- ------------- ¦bge0 ¦ [switch]----[Gateway 80.242.192.65]---[INTERNET] As you see, the routing table is from the server, the 192.168.2/24 network is behind the firewall. It must have a static route on bge1 with gateway 192.168.3.254. Erik