From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 29 07:36:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BCF3DA; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:36:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA791BC1; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:c1ca:3dbc:5137:8c40]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5B9054AC57; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:36:24 +0400 (MSK) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:36:23 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <187241224.20130429113623@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: New hardware, old problem: stuck beacon when here is WiFi traffic In-Reply-To: References: <2810538978.20130423164137@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1813905823.20130423184528@serebryakov.spb.ru> <184105677.20130424002002@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1936997795.20130424003555@serebryakov.spb.ru> <886711115.20130424004702@serebryakov.spb.ru> <6010292503.20130426001447@serebryakov.spb.ru> <99510815.20130426122508@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1467048277.20130428225006@serebryakov.spb.ru> <725880393.20130429004352@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:36:27 -0000 Hello, Adrian. You wrote 29 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2013 =E3., 11:29:32: AC> Please update to -HEAD first! Ok :) These test were on r250017. AC> And erm, run iperf tcp first, before udp. That way aggregation is AC> negotiated. :-) Ok. But on previous revisions it was not needed. But previous tests were done no at Sunday night, and at Sunday night environment is worst here. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov