Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:17:03 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcelm@juniper.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Old LOR between devfs & devfsmount resurfacing? Message-ID: <20080207111703.GA94844@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20080207110901.GZ57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <B269B28B-C66E-4AC6-A4D9-FBA378466F89@juniper.net> <20080207045015.GW57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <3bbf2fe10802070216idd5206ey7a66c0873311e66c@mail.gmail.com> <20080207104354.GY57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <3bbf2fe10802070304r29cb8d2u1210fe285c917424@mail.gmail.com> <20080207110901.GZ57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > This LOR shall not be ignored globally. When real, it caused the easily > reproducable lockup of the machine. >=20 > It would be better to introduce some lockmgr flag to ignore _this_ lockin= g. Wouldn't it be easier to just fix the LOR itself, or are we dealing with some kind of chicken-and-egg situation? --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> WWW: http://g-rave.nl/ --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeq6K8ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwVKpACcCZuVq3FUjfYJO3iWwxDwUjro k6AAn204qd/yBmZtlPoJU/c09cPjl5b1 =zs/1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080207111703.GA94844>