From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jun 26 00:54:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA09520 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 00:54:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp [203.137.129.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA09515 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 00:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp [43.27.98.57]) by inetfw.sonycsl.co.jp (8.8.5/3.5W) with ESMTP id QAA25555; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:54:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp (8.8.4/3.3W3) with ESMTP id QAA13876; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:54:03 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199706260754.QAA13876@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> To: Bill Fenner cc: Chris Csanady , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TCP/IP bug? Unnecessary fragmentation... In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 25 Jun 1997 13:13:43 PDT." <97Jun25.131348pdt.177513@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 16:54:03 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Bill Fenner wrote: >> Kenjiro Cho wrote: >I think, considering the wide use of TCP, the socket layer should try >to call tcp_usr_send all at once when possible. >> That would be going backwards, to some extent. Van Jacobson wrote >> in a 1988 message about upping TCP stack performance: Hmmm, was the Nagle algorithm already implemented back then? The modified sosend ends up with a long delay when divided chunks trigger the Nagle Algorithm. It seems worse than the possible gain by parallelism. --kj --- Kenjiro Cho Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc.