From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Wed Nov 18 03:13:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AB1A30E88 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 03:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77D91FD8 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 03:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from zeppelin.tachypleus.net (75-101-50-44.static.sonic.net [75.101.50.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id tAI3DZF4029008 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:13:36 -0800 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org From: Nathan Whitehorn Subject: Patch for testing for ELF ARM image activator Message-ID: <564BECDF.2020504@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:13:35 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVaeMVUr/NUMlxbhARry8/g7lF3FmG9I8zM1BZxxqU0NXa1jYd3B6t6/iA/0rIXvYgj9xqPsFDYmGwE3fvZJ8ZfTSh+jbewasyA= X-Sonic-ID: C;ntIwW6KN5RGphr0U9jFv0A== M;LGubW6KN5RGphr0U9jFv0A== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 03:13:45 -0000 Could someone please give the patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/imgact_header_supported.diff a shot for me? It fixes a bug in the way the header_supported() routine for the ARM ELF brand is called. The patch should be a no-op. -Nathan