From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Nov 11 20:04:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA19034 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:04:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (gamefish.pcola.gulf.net [198.69.72.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA19027 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:04:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Received: from localhost (psalzman@localhost) by gamefish.pcola.gulf.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA01674; Thu, 12 Nov 1998 04:04:12 GMT (envelope-from psalzman@gamefish.pcola.gulf.net) Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 04:04:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Phillip Salzman To: Lukman Salim cc: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: Using NAT for ISP customer In-Reply-To: <364A4EC5.EBDD266B@usa.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org natd was designed for cable modems... this should work.. as for software, you'll have to play with it to allow: realaudio, quake, quake2, etc. On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, Lukman Salim wrote: > Hi, > > I will be starting a cable-modem based ISP in the near future. Because > of the potential concurrent online user among the cable modem user would > be a lot greater than traditional ISP, I'm thinking of using local IP > with NAT for those who don't need real IP. Has anyone had any experience > with such a scheme using FreeBSD's natd? I know that some apps would not > run, but does the majority of Internet user use such software? > > Thanks in advance! > > Lukman > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message