From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Fri Apr 28  5:42:47 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from vader.runit.sintef.no (vader.runit.sintef.no [129.241.100.134])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DBF37BEAA
	for <FreeBSD-advocacy@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 05:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from he@runit.sintef.no)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by vader.runit.sintef.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA29620;
	Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:41:32 +0200 (MEST)
To: grog@lemis.com
Cc: seebs@plethora.net, FreeBSD-advocacy@freebsd.org,
	netbsd-advocacy@NetBSD.ORG, advocacy@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Document: What's the difference between Linux and BSD?
From: Havard.Eidnes@runit.sintef.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:02:22 +0200"
	<20000428140222P.he@runit.sintef.no>
References: <20000428140222P.he@runit.sintef.no>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93 on Emacs 19.34 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20000428144131G.he@runit.sintef.no>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 14:41:31 +0200
X-Dispatcher: imput version 980905(IM100)
Lines: 11
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Earlier I wrote:

> However, at the moment, there is no AT&T code left in the freely
> available BSDs, so what makes it then a derivative?  Won't this
> statement perpetuate the misunderstanding that the freely available
> BSDs are still under threat of litigation from AT&T?

Hmm, I see I should have read the entire paper before commenting.
I need to learn to keep my mouth shut.  Sorry 'bout that.

- H=E5vard


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message