From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 6 11:08:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA071065696 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6738FC2A for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2010 11:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rmac.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1OsZYa-0005Rh-Lw; Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:08:12 +0000 Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:08:12 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Ian FREISLICH In-Reply-To: References: <4C84A44D.90403@3mail4.co.uk> <4C825094.5040204@secover.com.br> <20100905155311.GA48095@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <4C84364D.9070700@DataIX.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: significantly slow IPFW + NATD + amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:08:16 -0000 Ian FREISLICH wrote: > > Peter Reo Molnar wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I tried setup NAT with IPFW, compiled my kernel and I found that there > > is very slow connection. > > After I disabled NAT and IPFW then speed was increased. > > > > 64-bit FreeBSD 9-CURRENT : > > With IPFW: 1.2 MB/sec > > Without IPFW: 33 MB/sec > > > > > > my ipfw work with i386 (stable) without speed decreasing: > > > > fw.test.conf: > > -f flush > > add 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via re0 > > add 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > > add 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > add 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > This looks like you're using the old style NAT - divert to userland. > That has always performed poorly. Perhaps not as poorly as this > though. How much CPU is natd consuming? > > Have you considered using in-kernel NAT? See the 'NETWORK ADDRESS > TRANSLATION' section in the ipfw manual. It's worth a try. i never managed to figure out how to convert my pppoe nat config to ipfw natting. foo: set device PPPoE:vr0 set MTU 1454 accept CHAP enable lqr add default HISADDR nat enable yes nat port tcp 192.168.0.33:51332 51332 nat port udp 192.168.0.33:51332 51332 set authname blogovitch set authkey vitchoblog loop: set log phase chat connect lcp ipcp command set device localhost:pptp set dial set login set ifaddr 192.168.0.200 192.168.0.201 255.255.255.255 clue bat solicited randy