From owner-cvs-all Wed Aug 2 8:39:28 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1505937BC2E; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:38:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.106]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04865; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:38:43 +0300 (EEST) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA46373; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 18:38:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3988405A.88BE78E4@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 18:38:03 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ade Lovett Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/ImageMagick Makefile References: <200008020152.SAA99750@freefall.freebsd.org> <3987BCAD.81CC44B7@FreeBSD.org> <20000802091138.C48437@FreeBSD.org> <39882E2D.1C3BE338@FreeBSD.org> <20000802100401.H48437@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ade Lovett wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 05:20:29PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > I disagree, because even if GNOME folks will update GNOME itself quite quickly, 3rd > > party authors may not. > > Then I suggest that you contact the libxml/libxml2 author and voice > your concerns about the fact that these two pieces of software at > present cannot coexist on the same machine. I doubt it will be helpful. Such decisions should be made by the author on early states of development, when he sees that the new version is going to be API/ABI incompatible with oldest releases. Now, when the software is in pre-release stage, it could be too hard for author to make such a change. > Making (substantial) local modifications to the libxml2 port, only > to then rip them out again once libxml dies sounds like needless > work, which should really be done by the author. I wholeheartedly agree with you, but we certainly can't leave it "as it" just because the author don't care (for example: gtk/glib case, iconv case etc.). > Just for reference, excluding those ports that are part of the GNOME > metaport, which we'll assume will be appropriately updated on a > switchover, I count only 11 ports that have direct dependencies > on textproc/libxml (and thus assume that they'd have to be modified > to use libxml2). 11 ports is not a small number. Some people may rely on some of these ports. Particularly, I use xls2xml and certainly don't want to loose it ;). Probably we should take slightly different approach: when gnome1.4 is released we will modify old libxml to append '1' to its all pieces and will modify those unhappy 11 ports accordingly. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message