From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 29 18:09:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D954216A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:09:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A9643D2F for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:09:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id iATI8to9049657; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:08:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:08:55 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Vulpes Velox Message-ID: <20041129180854.GG5518@dan.emsphone.com> References: <41AAB892.70707@adelphia.net> <20041129060333.GB5518@dan.emsphone.com> <20041129115236.1519bbb6@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041129115236.1519bbb6@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Kevin Smith cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: moving ports to another file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:09:06 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 29), Vulpes Velox said: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:03:33 -0600 Dan Nelson wrote: > > In the last episode (Nov 28), Kevin Smith said: > > > The /usr/ports can take up a lot of space and I'm wondering if > > > there are limitations to having ports live in a another files > > > system with a symbolic link from /usr/ports to a ports directory > > > in another file system. > > > > No limitations at all. You can even symlink it over NFS to another > > machine if you want (set WRKDIRPREFIX to a local path in > > /etc/make.conf though, to speed up builds). > > If one is going to be using NFS for it, I don't see any reason not to > just mount it right to /usr/ports instead of messing with symbolic > linking. The symlink lets amd do the work of mounting the filesystem, that's all. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com