Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 18:08:20 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: OpenSSL vs. GNU GPL (affects security/openvpn)? Message-ID: <m3vfwte3gr.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <m3wuhcj3ku.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> (Matthias Andree's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:17:53 %2B0200") References: <m3wuhcj3ku.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> writes: > it has recently been brought to my attention that the OpenVPN package > links against both OpenSSL (which is under a BSD-derived license with > advertising clause) and LZO (which is under the GNU GPL). OpenVPN itself > includes an exception to the GNU GPL allowing linking against OpenSSL. No opinions? I'll then forbid binary packages when I update the port next time (OpenVPN 1.4.0 is due soon). -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3vfwte3gr.fsf>