Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 11:50:35 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "types" man page Message-ID: <20011024115035.L25747@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpwv1lyofv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <xzp1yjt0z14.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20011024114432.K25747@squall.waterspout.com> <xzpwv1lyofv.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:48:04PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > It's definitely not kernel-only, so I don't think 9 is appropriate; 7 > would be a last resort if we can't think of anything better. There *is* nothing better. types(3) maybe, but it's not for library calls. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011024115035.L25747>