From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 22:18:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE9C106564A for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:18:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjr@cruwe.de) Received: from cruwe.de (t1850.greatnet.de [83.133.124.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0874D8FC15 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1990 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2011 22:18:04 -0000 Received: from p5b37a39b.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO dijkstra) (smtpallow@91.55.163.155) by t1850.greatnet.de with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2011 22:18:04 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:18:00 +0100 From: "Christopher J. Ruwe" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110114231800.6dcca6f3@dijkstra> In-Reply-To: <4D30BCAA.5090501@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20110114181925.49e5ee2d@dijkstra> <4D30BCAA.5090501@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/wFqNHCqZYuaN_ycplqgLZ/3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:18:07 -0000 --Sig_/wFqNHCqZYuaN_ycplqgLZ/3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:14:18 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 14/01/2011 17:19, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > I would like to test Martin Matuskas patch for ZFS v28 against > > stable. Can I patch against any stable (like stable of today) or > > does it necessarily need to be the stable-tree of the date > > specified in the patch-file? > >=20 > > If the latter should be true, how do I obtain a stable tree of any > > given date? > >=20 > > Thanks for any help, kind regards, >=20 > You can generally patch against a version more recent than when the > patch was released, up to a point. If there are commits to any of the > files touched by the patch after the patch date, then the patch may > not apply properly, or the result may not work correctly. >=20 [...] >=20 > To obtain a copy of the stable sources as of a specific date, depends > on how you're getting the sources. >=20 > csup(1) or cvsup(1) has a date parameter which you can add to your > sup-file. See csup(1). Thank you for your help. Pulling RELENG_8 from a specific date (18th Dec) worked just fine, as well as patching, machine is compiling now. Nothing more to do now, so I will check back after breakfast tomorrow morning. I am hoping this will also fix my geli issue on boot ... Cheers, --=20 Christopher TZ GMT + 1 --Sig_/wFqNHCqZYuaN_ycplqgLZ/3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNMMumAAoJEJTIKW/o3iwUGaEQAJXbpAJX8HGM2L2zN9q+m3YO H9FF2mo3XBHnbvbYArKGE5Bgg/WxPDxIOUpaptYoOcd52Eec2pi+1OyMKdrOuxft sonBY+z6VGTRB3aBoNgof8HFh7WIv4e3p9rGAzEGvZcBDncvGEPUdnLO8psOEWBr CPlbyARtLA+vkse8b1qWcaNecyewU5d1NYbXZuhaSG3qB9ZVaoCK4eay90XUifbG AfUa9NSItRQJUuF32BKMmVU4zgxlnWIg1Sg9SyS0whg+qme0/qq+wvJ/ZPzdqBXm Q/bbQdG59Han1t0TVBJ6mQnRpabocowSuSaJs1KLZYA1E3RR7/YMZzEmJUwJ0UM3 I0y5cL1fqSsW/nBKu+FLfo4W4GzdYBNhBuLSXj6h0eg1DiMfRDDXHS3th8tklgGp fVA2XekGbBqdYxbBWBHyKoFEwS77ImuwNscYf2CULFTvfingzJkbdQJTmvh5kZuI J7eGP78SZDVAm1Nvt30WSfDtA829LBAGUEFQ5Y3hDdVD95h7RG3R6fsuM/gadtdC OoPHCO0jTcDaQ+CPOUcK9wfOUEedpiHpMyl5JvrMmhEKlrWaeHoJavX+jyrM1caA KqSAwavGwHhePygkYLrn4kLtMObKGuxe7+Ck2+b5TINzPKqHl0CGL6BriM0YAg0r oFiYZsDweR3qXkVtsYcU =ymRc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/wFqNHCqZYuaN_ycplqgLZ/3--