From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 6 14:42:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA04086 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 14:42:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (sunrise.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.121]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA04056 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 14:41:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA01391; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 14:41:53 -0800 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 14:41:53 -0800 Message-Id: <199603062241.OAA01391@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> To: adam@veda.is CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199603062113.VAA01980@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Wed, 6 Mar 1996 21:13:28 +0000 (GMT)) Subject: Re: PATCH_PRFX in bsd.port.mk From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Ok. I was considering adding a new variable for putting all files > (distfiles + patchfiles) in a subdirectory. Currently some ports just > get around this by defining ${DISTDIR} = ${PORTSDIR}/distfiles/. Another thing I forgot to say -- the reason why I wanted to do this was so that we can descend to the appropriate subdirectory of ftp.freebsd.org as a backup site. (Your PATCH_PRFX code correctly handles this, but porters setting DISTDIR doesn't.) Satoshi