From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 22 21:10:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA03211 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 21:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lepton.nuc.net (wheelman@lepton.nuc.net [204.49.61.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA03201 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 21:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (wheelman@localhost) by lepton.nuc.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA06585; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 23:09:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 23:09:55 -0500 (CDT) From: Jaime Bozza To: Doug White cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Driver Question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 22 Apr 1997, Doug White wrote: > The 900 is 10/100 as well, if I remember correctly. The 905 may be > better. (It may have less cache because the PCI bus is probed faster than > the ISA bus is...) The 900 is straight 10, the 905 is 10/100 ... (Interestingly enough, the 10/100 cards have special pricing right now from what I've seen) > The Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B is supported quite well in FreeBSD; also > any DE21x4x based cards (Kingston, SMC, Accton, Dayna, others) work very > nicely. Got the same recommendation from someone else. Thanks. :) > Is there a requirement for 100mbit? The EtherExpress is known to work at > 100 megabit. No requirement at this time, other than the fact that 10/100 cards have better pricing right now, and it'll allow me a better upgrade path at the point that I *DO* put parts of my system at 100Mbit. Jaime Bozza Nucleus Communications, Inc.